Norway is the market most often mishandled by exporters who assume Europe is one procedure. It is not an EU member, agriculture sits outside its EEA agreement, and while its food safety rules are in practice aligned with the EU's — which makes the technical standards reassuringly familiar — the customs and registration route is genuinely separate. Treating a Norwegian shipment as an EU shipment with a different address is the single most common way to lose several weeks.
The registration route
Commercial food imports into Norway are notified to and registered with Mattilsynet, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. That is the procedural centre of gravity, and it is where a Norwegian importer's own obligations sit. For the supplier, the practical consequence is that the documentation package has to serve a Norwegian filing rather than an EU one — same underlying evidence in most cases, different destination for it. Because the safety standards themselves are EU-aligned, a supplier already working to European documentation discipline is not starting from scratch; they are redirecting.
Where the tariffs are, and are not
Norway's import protection follows a clear logic: it is high for what the country produces itself, and low or absent for what it does not. Meat, dairy and grain are strongly protected. Dried fruit, nuts, tea and spices — none of which Norway grows — face low or zero duties, which is precisely why those categories dominate the realistic import list for a Turkish supplier. Processed foods such as confectionery can carry moderate duties, so the rate has to be checked product by product rather than inferred from the category. Turkey already supplies Norway with olives, olive oil, dried fruit, pulses and spices, so this is a working trade route rather than a theoretical one.